Vol. 23 No. 14 California’s Medical Marijuana Id Card Program Is Not Unconstitutional

CALIFORNIA’S MEDICAL MARIJUANA ID CARD PROGRAM IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL August 4, 2008 On July 31, 2008, the California Court of Appeal ruled, in County of San Diego v. San Diego NORML, that the requirement of the Medical Marijuana Program (“MMP”), that counties provide medicinal marijuana identification cards to qualified patients, did not violate the Federal […]

CPOA Magazine Article- Possession of Handguns – New Case Decisions

“POSSESSION OF HANDGUNS – NEW CASE DECISIONS” August, 2008 By:  Martin J. Mayer JONES & MAYER In June, 2008, the United States Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the case ofDistrict of Columbia v. Heller, 2008 DAR 9613.  In a 5 – 4 decision, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the District of […]

Vol. 23 No. 13- Coleman/Plata Update

COLEMAN/PLATA UPDATE July 17, 2008 In our last update on the prisoner release litigation [Coleman v. Schwarzenegger/Plata v. Schwarzenegger], we informed you that all parties, including intervenors, were actively engaged in the settlement process.  While all of the parties worked tirelessly at reaching a resolution, settlement was not able to be achieved.  On June 23, […]

CSSA Magazine Article- Union Activity First Amendment Rights

“UNION ACTIVITY AND FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS” July, 2008 By:  Martin J. Mayer JONES & MAYER On April 24, 2008, the First Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued a ruling in the case ofDavignon, et al. vs. Hodgson involving the plaintiffs’ claim that the sheriff suspended them from duty in retaliation for their First Amendment protected […]

Vol. 23 No. 12- State Will Appeal Medical Marijuana Ruling

STATE WILL APPEAL MEDICAL MARIJUANA RULING June 9, 2008 Just last week, on May 27, 2008, we published a Client Alert Memo (Vol. 23, No. 10) regarding a Court of Appeal decision in the case of People v. Kelly.  In that case, the Court ruled that the statutory cap established by the legislature in SB […]

Vol. 23 No. 11- CPRA & Critical Incidents

CPRA & CRITICAL INCIDENTS June 5, 2008 Recently the California Attorney General published an official opinion (No. 07-208)  concluding that, absent justification, law enforcement agencies are obligated to disclose names of public sector employees involved in critical incidents, such as officer involved shootings.  Based upon statutory and case law we concur with the opinion of […]

Vol. 23 No. 10- Statutory Limit On Medical Marijuana Is Unconstitutional

STATUTORY LIMIT ON MEDICAL MARIJUANA IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL May 27, 2008 In 1996 California voters approved Proposition 215, the Compassionate Use Act [CUA], which granted limited immunity from criminal prosecution of those who possessed and used marijuana, if they qualified as medical users. On May 22, 2008, the California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District ruled, in […]

CPOA Network Newsletter Article- Supervisors Not Responsible for Retaliation Under FEHA

SUPERVISORS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR RETALIATION UNDER FEHA May, 2008 By:  Martin J. Mayer CPOA Network Newsletter A significant “victory” for California employers, and their supervisors, has come about as the result of a recent Supreme Court decision.  Supervisors can now relax, to some extent, and stop worrying about whether they will face litigation, and possible personal liability, when an adverse […]

Vol. 23 No. 16- AG Guidelines Regarding Medical Marijuana

AG GUIDELINES REGARDING MEDICAL MARIJUANA AUGUST 27, 2008 The California Attorney General has just released guidelines regarding California’s medical marijuana law, under the authority of Health & Safety Code section 11362.81(d).  After the passage of Proposition 215, the Legislature passed SB 420, which created the Medical Marijuana Program Act (MMP), which was codified in the […]