Vol. 29, No. 17 Supreme Court Denies Review on California Prison Case
U.S. SUPREME COURT DENIES REVIEW ON CALIFORNIA PRISON CASE On June 9, 2014, the U.S. Supreme Court denied California’s petition for review of the decision in Armstrong v. Brown, which had held that California’s prison officials failed to monitor and protect former inmates who were returned to county jails instead of state prisons for parole […]
Vol. 29 No. 6 – CCW PERMITS, THE NINTH CIRCUIT RULING, AND CONFUSION
CCW PERMITS, THE NINTH CIRCUIT RULING, AND CONFUSION On February 13, 2014, a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, in the case of Peruta, et al. v. County of San Diego and William D. Gore, Sheriff, ruled 2 -1 that “San Diego County’s ‘good cause’ permitting requirement [to issue a […]
Vol. 29 No. 5 – Ninth Circuit Invalidates California’s “Good Cause” Requirement for Issuance of CCW
NINTH CIRCUIT INVALIDATES CALIFORNIA’S “GOOD CAUSE” REQUIREMENT FOR ISSUANCE OF CCW PERMIT On February 13, 2014, in the case of Peruta, et al v. County of San Diego, et al., the Ninth Circuit U. S. Court of Appeals, in a 2-1 decision, invalidated California’s requirement that CCW applicants show “good cause” to be granted a concealed […]
Vol. 29 No. 4 – Legislation Proposes Representation For Peace Officers Who Are Witnesses
LEGISLATION PROPOSES REPRESENTATION FOR PEACE OFFICERS WHO ARE WITNESSES As of January 30, 2014, Senate Bill 388, proposed by State Senator Ted Lieu (Torrance), has passed the Senate and is in the Assembly for consideration. SB 388 would create a right of representation for an officer who is not the subject of any investigation, but […]
Vol. 29 No. 3 – OC Ordinance Restricting Sex Offenders From Entering Parks Preempted by State law
ORDINANCES RESTRICTING SEX OFFENDERS FROM ENTERING PARKS ARE PREEMPTED BY STATE LAW On January 10, 2014, the 4th District Court of Appeal, Division Three, ruledunanimously, in an unpublished opinion, People v. Godinez, that California’s “statutory scheme imposing restrictions on a sex offender’s daily life fully occupies the field and therefore preempts [Orange] county’s efforts to […]
Vol. 29 No. 2 – Ninth Circut Rules That Cities Cannot Compel Motels To Provide Guest Information Without Consent Or A Warrant
NINTH CIRCUIT RULES THAT CITIES CANNOT COMPEL MOTELS TO PROVIDE GUEST INFORMATION WITHOUT CONSENT OR A WARRANT On December 24, 2013, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, in Patel v. City of Los Angeles, ruled that an L.A. Municipal Code section which allows police officers to inspect hotel guest […]
Vol. 29 No. 1 – Federal Court Rules That A Warrantless Breathalyzer Test Of An Officer After An “OIS” Is Lawful
FEDERAL COURT RULES THAT A WARRANTLESS BREATHALYZER TEST OF AN OFFICER AFTER AN “OIS” IS LAWFUL On November 15, 2013, the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled, inLynch v. City of New York, that the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) policy of administering a warrantless breathalyzer test to any officer who discharges a firearm, resulting […]
CPCA Magazine Article – Courts Listen to CPCA
COURTS LISTEN TO CPCA By: Martin J. Mayer, General Counsel California Police Chiefs’ Association The California Police Chiefs’ Association (CPCA) is well known for its legislative advocacy and the fact that its opinions are considered and respected in Sacramento. What might not be as well known is the extent of CPCA’s legal advocacy through the […]
Vol. 28 No. 28 – Negligent Supervisions, Chief Executives, and Personal Liability
NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION, CHIEF EXECUTIVES, AND PERSONAL LIABILITY On November 20, 2013 it was reported that Los Angeles County settled a negligent supervision lawsuit, brought by a former county jail inmate, in the amount of $722,000. The inmate, Dion Starr, alleged that Sheriff Leroy Baca showed “deliberate indifference” to dangerous conditions in the county jail, resulting […]
Vol. 28 No. 27 – Police “Whistleblowers” and the First Amendment
The following article is in the current edition of the International Association of Chiefs’ of Police (IACP) magazine and addresses the issue of “whistle blowing” by law enforcement officers and when, and what, protections apply under the First Amendment. The case arose out of an incident with the Burbank Police Department and resulted in an […]