Vol. 35 No. 23 DISTRICT COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION IN GRANTING NATIONWIDE INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BARRING DOJ FROM USING THREE NEW CONDITIONS AS FUNDING REQUIREMENTS FOR EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL JUSTICE ASSISTANCE GRANTS

In the July 2020 case of City & Cnty. of S.F. v. Barr,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a permanent injunction barring the United States Department of Justice from imposing certain conditions for providing funding for state and local criminal justice programs through Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance Grants.  However, the Court determined […]

Vol. 35 No. 22 POLICE OFFICERS’ FAILURE TO PRECISELY COMPLY WITH POLICE DEPARTMENT TOWING POLICY’S INVENTORY SEARCH DIRECTION DID NOT RENDER SEARCH INVALID

In United States v. Magdirila,[1] filed on June 23, 2020, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed a District Court’s denial of a criminal defendant’s motion to suppress contraband found during an inventory search of a vehicle he was driving.  In reaching its decision, the Court held that police officers’ failure to precisely comply with […]

Vol. 35 No. 9 GUIDANCE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES DURING COVID-19 STATE OF EMERGENCY

The pandemic circumstances we all face are placing tremendous demands on law enforcement personnel. Among organizational priorities is determining how to apply law enforcement authority under conditions not ordinarily encountered during general agency operations.  This alert is intended to bring together statutory authority and Executive Orders as an accessible reference for law enforcement leaders. Existing […]

Vol. 37 No. 4 PLAINTIFF POLICE CHIEF’S EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT CREATED A HYBRID EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CITY AND PLAINTIFF WHERE EMPLOYMENT AS CHIEF WAS AT WILL BUT EMPLOYMENT AS LIEUTENANT WAS NOT AT WILL

In Joseph v. City of Atwater, 74 Cal. App. 5th 974 (5th Dist. 2022), the Court of Appeal held that an employment agreement created a hybrid employment relationship between a city and a plaintiff employed as a chief of police.  In reaching its conclusion, the Court found that under the terms of the agreement, plaintiff’s […]

Vol. 36. No. 17 GOVERNMENT ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY IN PLAINTIFF’S ACTION ALLEGING THAT GOVERNMENT EMPLOYER VIOLATED HIS FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS BY DISCIPLINING HIM FOR PROTECTED SPEECH

In Ohlson v. Brady,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that public agency defendants were entitled to qualified immunity in an employee’s action alleging the defendants violated the employee’s First Amendment rights by disciplining him for protected speech.  In reaching its conclusion, the Court found no clearly established law on the issue of whether […]

VOL. 36 NO. 15 STATUTORY CHANGE TO LAW ENFORCEMENT USE OF SOCIAL MEDIA

On July 23, 2021, AB1475 was signed and chaptered into law, and will take effect on January 1, 2022.  The bill creates limitations on the ability of law enforcement agencies to disseminate booking photos on social media.  The legislation also has retroactive reach to content already in existence or that might be created in the […]

Vol. 36 No. 20 A POLICE CHIEF WAS NOT ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY WHEN AN OFFICER ASSERTED THAT SHE HAD BEEN RETALIATED AGAINST FOR FILING SEX-DISCRIMINATION LAWSUITS

In the case of Ballou v. McElvain,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of qualified immunity to a police chief on an officer’s First Amendment retaliation claim, holding that the officer’s speech opposing workplace sex discrimination was inherently speech on a matter of public concern and was clearly protected by the First […]