Journal of California Law Enforcement- Officer Involved Shootings: A Procedural and Legal Analysis

January 1, 2000

Vol. 23, No. 2

You might also enjoy

Vol. 40 No. 8 BECAUSE CALIFORNIA TORT LAW’S “REASONABLE CARE” STANDARD IS BROADER AND DISTINCT FROM THE FEDERAL FOURTH AMENDMENT’S REASONABLENESS STANDARD, NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT JURY’S MIXED VERDICTS – FINDING DEPUTIES DID NOT USE EXCESSIVE FORCE BUT WERE NEGLIGENT UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW – WERE RECONCILABLE

In Alves v. Cnty. of Riverside,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court

Vol. 40 No. 7 NO FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION WHERE WARRANTLESS ENTRY AND SEARCH OF PLAINTIFF’S HOME WAS JUSTIFIED UNDER THE HOT-PURSUIT EXCEPTION

In Newman v. Underhill,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

JONES MAYER OBTAINS DISMISSAL IN HUMAN SEXUAL TRAFFICKING CASE

After a woman discharged herself against medical advice from an