Journal of California Law Enforcement- To Provide or Not to Provide: No Longer a Question for Internal Affairs Investigations

January 1, 1990

Vol. 24 No. 4

Additionally, this might interest you

Vol. 41 No. 6 SUPREME COURT FINDS HAWAII LAW PROHIBITING LICENSED CONCEALED-CARRY PERMIT HOLDERS FROM CARRYING FIREARMS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY OPEN TO THE PUBLIC WITHOUT PROPERTY OWNER’S EXPRESS AUTHORIZATION UNCONSTITUTIONAL

In a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court in

Vol. 41 No. 5 POLICE OFFICERS CONDUCTED A FOURTH AMENDMENT SEARCH WHEN THEY ACQUIRED SUSPECT’S LOCATION DATA FROM GOOGLE VIA A GEOFENCE WARRANT

In a 6-3 decision in Chatrie v. United States,[1] the

Vol. 41 No. 4 OFFICER ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FOR FATAL SHOOTING OF FLEEING SUSPECT HOLDING INFANT WHERE NO CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW PROHIBITED THE USE OF DEADLY FORCE UNDER THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Fuhr v. City