Vol. 14 No. 4- Re: Federal Gun Ban/ Domestic Violence

June 8, 1999

CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM
June 8, 1999

COMING SOON!

You might also enjoy

Vol. 40 No. 11 IN RESOLVING FOURTH AMENDMENT EXCESSIVE-FORCE CLAIMS, COURTS MAY NOT APPLY THE MOMENT-OF-THREAT RULE BECAUSE THAT RULE CONSTRICTS THE PROPER INQUIRY INTO THE TOTALITY OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES

In Barnes v. Felix, the United States Supreme Court concluded

Vol. 40 No. 10 OFFICERS WHO ENGAGED IN AN UNNECESSARY HIGH-SPEED CHASE THAT KILLED BYSTANDERS WERE NOT ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

In Est. of Soakai v. Abdelaziz,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court

Vol. 40 No. 9 BLOCKING CONSTITUENTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA WAS A STATE ACTION WHERE PUBLIC OFFICIAL HAD ACTUAL AUTHORITY TO SPEAK ON STATE’S BEHALF AND PURPORTED TO EXERCISE THAT AUTHORITY WHEN POSTING

In Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals