We are pleased to announced that Tarquin Preziosi was named Partner at Jones & Mayer

February 12, 2021

We are pleased to announce that Tarquin Preziosi was named Partner at Jones & Mayer on February 12, 2021. Tarquin joined the firm in 2015 and specializes in municipal law. He serves as General Counsel to the Rossmoor Community Services District, Assistant City Attorney for the City of Costa Mesa, and Deputy City Attorney for number of other cities. Tarquin graduated from the University of California, Hastings College of Law.

You might also enjoy

Vol. 40 No. 9 BLOCKING CONSTITUENTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA WAS A STATE ACTION WHERE PUBLIC OFFICIAL HAD ACTUAL AUTHORITY TO SPEAK ON STATE’S BEHALF AND PURPORTED TO EXERCISE THAT AUTHORITY WHEN POSTING

In Garnier v. O’Connor-Ratcliff,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Vol. 40 No. 8 BECAUSE CALIFORNIA TORT LAW’S “REASONABLE CARE” STANDARD IS BROADER AND DISTINCT FROM THE FEDERAL FOURTH AMENDMENT’S REASONABLENESS STANDARD, NINTH CIRCUIT HOLDS THAT JURY’S MIXED VERDICTS – FINDING DEPUTIES DID NOT USE EXCESSIVE FORCE BUT WERE NEGLIGENT UNDER CALIFORNIA LAW – WERE RECONCILABLE

In Alves v. Cnty. of Riverside,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court

Vol. 40 No. 7 NO FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION WHERE WARRANTLESS ENTRY AND SEARCH OF PLAINTIFF’S HOME WAS JUSTIFIED UNDER THE HOT-PURSUIT EXCEPTION

In Newman v. Underhill,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

We are pleased to announced that Tarquin Preziosi was named Partner at Jones & Mayer

You might also enjoy

Vol. 40 No. 9 BLOCKING CONSTITUENTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA WAS A STATE ACTION WHERE PUBLIC OFFICIAL HAD ACTUAL AUTHORITY TO SPEAK ON STATE’S BEHALF AND PURPORTED TO EXERCISE THAT AUTHORITY WHEN POSTING

Vol. 40 No. 7 NO FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION WHERE WARRANTLESS ENTRY AND SEARCH OF PLAINTIFF’S HOME WAS JUSTIFIED UNDER THE HOT-PURSUIT EXCEPTION

Fullerton

Citrus Heights