Vol. 37 No. 1 A POLICE OFFICER WAS ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY BECAUSE PLAINTIFF JOURNALIST DID NOT IDENTIFY A CLEARLY ESTABLISHED RIGHT THAT THE OFFICER VIOLATED

In Saved Magazine v. Spokane Police Department,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that an officer was entitled to qualified immunity because the Court was unaware of any precedent that would alert an officer that his enforcement of separate protest zones would violate clearly established First Amendment law.  In reaching its conclusion, the Court […]

Vol. 36 No. 26 CALIFORNIA STATUTE PROHIBITING POSSESSION OF LARGE-CAPACITY MAGAZINES IS A REASONABLE FIT FOR THE IMPORTANT GOVERNMENT INTEREST OF REDUCING GUN VIOLENCE

In Duncan v. Bonta,[1] the en banc Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a California statute which banned possession of magazines holding more than ten rounds of ammunition was a reasonable fit for the compelling goal of reducing gun violence.  The Court therefore reversed the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to Plaintiffs on […]

Vol. 36 No. 24 GOVERNOR SIGNS ASSEMBLY BILL 481 ESTABLISHING NEW REQUIREMENTS ON THE WAY AGENCIES FUND, ACQUIRE, AND USE MILITARY EQUIPMENT

On September 30, 2021, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 481 (“AB 481”), which will become effective on January 1, 2022.[1]  AB 481 stated goals are to provide legally enforceable safeguards to protect the public’s welfare, safety, civil rights, and civil liberties before military equipment is funded, acquired, or used. Background Existing law designates the Department […]

VOL. 36 NO. 21 CALIFORNIA ASSEMBLY BILL 32 IMPEDES FEDERAL IMMIGRATION POLICY

In October 2021, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in GEO Grp., Inc. v. Newsom,[1] reversed a District Court’s order denying the United States’ motion for a preliminary injunction against a California law that phases out private detention facilities within the state.  The Court concluded that, because California Assembly Bill 32 (“AB 32”) conflicts with […]

Vol. 36 No. 22 SUPREME COURT CONCLUDES THAT POLICE OFFICERS DID NOT VIOLATE ANY CLEARLY ESTABLISHED LAW, AND WERE THUS ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY

In October 2021, the United States Supreme Court, in its per curiam decision City of Tahlequah v. Bond,[1] concluded that a Circuit Court of Appeals erred in denying police officers qualified immunity.  In reaching its conclusion, the Supreme Court found that there was no clearly established law with the appropriate level of specificity to align […]

Vol. 36 No. 14 Update: Executive Decisions and the COVID-19 Vaccines

The persistence of the COVID-19 pandemic, the transmissibility associated with the Delta variant, and differing beliefs about personal autonomy and the role of government in mandating methods of illness prevention have again brought the issue of mandatory vaccines to the center of public policy.  The purpose of this Alert is to provide law enforcement executives […]

Vol. 36 No. 6 THE COURT OF APPEAL RESOLVED THE CONFLICT BETWEEN AN SB1421 DISCLOSURE WHICH VIOLATED A PROVISION OF A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT IN A DISCIPLINARY ACTION AND DECIDED WHAT THE “FINAL DETERMINATION OF SUSTAINED DISCIPLINE” MEANS IN SB1421

The First District Court of Appeal in Collondrez v. City of Rio Vista, (2021) 61 Cal. App. 5th 1039, issued a decision in which a settlement agreement following a disciplinary action involving a peace officer promised confidentiality in the internal investigative documentation which led to the discipline.  The Court of Appeal determined that SB 1421 […]

California Law Enforcement and Body-Worn Cameras in 2021

The widespread adoption of body-worn cameras (BWCs) by law enforcement agencies throughout the United States has transformed public expectations of transparency and accountability in policing. While much of the transparency brought by BWCs has had a positive influence on policing, it has also created complex challenges. This article summarizes important elements of California law that […]