Vol. 26 No. 15- FFBOR – Applies To Chartered Cities And Counties
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer, Esq. FFBOR APPLIES TO CHARTERED CITIES AND COUNTIES July 25, 2011 On May 24, 2011, the 6th District Court of Appeal held, in the case of International Association of Firefighters Local Union 230 v. City of San Jose, that the Firefighters […]
Vol. 26 No. 14- Supreme Court Rules That A Conflict Of Interest Law Is Not Unconstitutional
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer, Esq. SUPREME COURT RULES THAT A CONFLICT OF INTEREST LAW IS NOT UNCONSTITUTIONAL June 14, 2011 On June 13, 2011, the United States Supreme Court held, in the case of Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan that Nevada’s Ethics in Government […]
Vol. 26 No. 13 Camreta V. Greene Vacated By U.S. Supreme Court
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer, Esq. Camreta v. Greene Vacated by U.S. Supreme Court June 10, 2011 On May 26, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court held in the case of Camreta v. Greene, that even though the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals had granted qualified immunity […]
Vol. 26 No. 11- U.S. Supreme Court Orders Release Of Approximately 44,000 State Inmates
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer, Esq. U.S. SUPREME COURT ORDERS RELEASE OF APPROXIMATELY 44,000 STATE INMATES May 23, 2011 Today, the United States Supreme Court upheld the order of a three judge federal court, in the case of Coleman/Plata v. Schwarzenegger (now Brown v. Coleman/Plata), which had […]
Vol. 26 No. 11 – Another Challenge To California’s Law On Concealed Weapon Permits
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer, Esq. ANOTHER CHALLENGE TO CALIFORNIA’S LAW ON CONCEALED WEAPON PERMITS May 31, 2011 On May 13, 2011, in the case of Adam Richards et al. v. County Of Yolo and Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto, U. S. District Court Judge Morrison […]
Vol 26. No. 20- Court Upholds City’s Ban On Dispensaries
On August 15, 2011, the City of Anaheim was found to have the legal right to ban medical marijuana dispensaries from the city. Superior Court Judge David Chaffee ruled, in part, that “it is readily apparent that the statute [Medical Marijuana Program Act (MMPA)] does not protect mass distribution [of medical marijuana] from designation by […]
Vol 26. No. 21- OPEN CARRY – Issue Arises Again
To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Paul R. Coble, Esq. In December of 2008 our office published a Client Alert Memorandum titled “Citizen Carrying Firearm In Plain View.” (See Vol. 23 No. 23 December 4, 2008) This Client Alert addressed the issue of so-called “Open Carry” of firearms. Recently, the office of a California […]
Vol. 26 No. 22- Public “Open Carry” — Alameda County District Attorney “Point Of View”
CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Paul R. Coble, Esq. PUBLIC “OPEN CARRY” — ALAMEDA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY “POINT OF VIEW” September 1, 2011 Our purpose, indeed our sole raison d’etre as a law firm, is to provide the most accurate, timely legal counsel possible to our law enforcement clients, […]
Officers’ Personal Cell Phones – Subject to Discovery?
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHIEFS OF POLICE LEGAL OFFICERS’ SECTION October 23, 2011 “OFFICER’S PERSONAL CELL PHONES – SUBJECT TO DISCOVERY?” 118th Annual Conference Chicago – October 2011 By: Martin J. Mayer, General Counsel California Police Chiefs Association “Officers’ Personal Cell Phones – Subject to Discovery?” With the phenomenal growth of ownership of personal cell […]
Vol. 26 No. 27 – DNA Case Accepted By The Supreme Court For Review
DNA CASE ACCEPTED BY THE SUPREME COURT FOR REVIEW In August, 2011 the California Court of Appeal held, in People v. Buza, that the taking of DNA from felony arrestees, immediately after arrest, was an unconstitutional invasion of the arrestee’s right of privacy. The California Supreme Court has accepted the Buza case for review. First […]