California Peace Officers’ Association, “Current Legal Issues Regarding POBR,” Fresno, CA.

November 10, 2015

Additionally, this might interest you

Vol. 40 No. 18 WHEN OFFICERS LOSE A SUSPECT’S TRAIL FOR EIGHTEEN MINUTES, THERE IS NO HOT PURSUIT

In Jones v. City of N. Las Vegas,[1] the Ninth

Vol. 40 No. 17 DESPITE DEFENDANT RETAINING A PRIVACY INTEREST IN ABANDONED IPHONE, BECAUSE SUBSEQUENT SEARCH WAS WARRANT-BASED AND REASONABLE, THERE WAS NO FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION

In United States v. Hunt,[1]the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Vol. 40 No. 16 OFFICER’S USE OF LESS-LETHAL FORCE THAT SERIOUSLY INJURED BYSTANDER FILMING NEAR A PROTESTING CROWD NOT UNREASONABLE GIVEN THAT PROTESTERS OBJECTIVELY POSED AN IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF OFFICERS, CITIZENS, AND PROPERTY

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Cheairs v.