Vol 31. No. 25-THE TRUTH ACT, THE TRUST ACT, ICE DETAINERS AND CALIFORNIA LAW ENFORCEMENT

On September 28, 2016, Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Assembly Bill (AB) 2792, known as the Transparent Review of Unjust Transfers and Holds (TRUTH) Act.  The Act imposes obligations on California law enforcement if they notify the Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Agency of an inmate’s upcoming date and time of release. Current […]

Vol. 31 No. 23-PROPOSITION 64 AND PEACE OFFICERS – CAN THEY NOW LEGALLY USE MARIJUANA?

Proposition 64, the California Marijuana Legalization Initiative, was on the November 8, 2016, ballot in California as an initiated state statute.  Supporters referred to the initiative as the Adult Use of Marijuana Act but its official title was the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (“the Adult Use of Marijuana Act”).  It […]

Vol. 31. No. 22- CREATING A “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP” CAN CREATE LIABILITY

CREATING A “SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP” CAN CREATE LIABILITY On October 6, 2016, the Fifth District Court of Appeal issued an opinion in the case of Doe, et al. v. City of Modesto, et al. and held that Modesto police officers created a special relationship with the family of a mentally ill woman by promising to take […]

Vol. 31 No. 3- PERF PUBLISHES TROUBLING “PRINCIPLES” CONCERNING USE OF FORCE

PERF PUBLISHES TROUBLING “PRINCIPLES” CONCERNING USE OF FORCE On January 29, 2016, the Police Executive Research Forum (“PERF”) issued a 12-page policy statement entitled “Use of Force: Taking Policing to a Higher Standard; 30 Guiding Principles.” In it, PERF basically advocates 13 separate policy recommendations, concerning tactics, training and equipment. Several of the policy recommendations […]

Vol. 31 No. 2- NEW “GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER” IN EFFECT AS OF 1/1/16

NEW “GUN VIOLENCE RESTRAINING ORDER” IN EFFECT AS OF 1/1/16 As of January 1, 2016, AB 1014, the “Gun Violence Restraining Order” (“GVRO”) went into effect. This new law pertains to individuals who own/possess/have access to any firearm or any ammunition and, by a finding of a court, who pose an immediate threat to themselves […]

Vol. 31 No 1. TASER USE RESTRICTED BY 4th CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

TASER USE RESTRICTED BY 4th CIRCUIT U.S. COURT OF APPEALS On January 11, 2016, the 4th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held, in the case of Armstrong v. Village of Pinehurst et al, that the Fourth Amendment prohibits the use of a taser [an electronic control device (ECD)], unless the police can articulate an “immediate […]

Vol. 30 No. 27 CAN SPEECH ALONE BE A PENAL CODE 148 VIOLATION?

CAN SPEECH ALONE BE A PENAL CODE 148 VIOLATION? On December 18, 2015, the California Court of Appeal held, in the case of In re Chase C.,that a minor did not violate PC 148 when he encouraged others to not cooperate with a sheriff’s deputy. The court stated that “we are asked to decide a […]

Vol. 31 No. 4- NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION AND EXECUTIVE LIABILITY

NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION AND EXECUTIVE LIABILITY Following is an article I wrote for the current issue of “The Police Chief” magazine, which is published by the International Association of Chiefs’ of Police (IACP) and distributed nationally and internationally to all members of IACP. As we all know, the current environment reflects open hostility by certain members […]