January 29, 2015 -Martin J. Mayer Presenting POST San Diego Regional Training Center Class #87- Week 2 Risk Mgmt Legal Update, San Diego, California

January 29, 2015

Additionally, this might interest you

Vol. 40 No. 17 DESPITE DEFENDANT RETAINING A PRIVACY INTEREST IN ABANDONED IPHONE, BECAUSE SUBSEQUENT SEARCH WAS WARRANT-BASED AND REASONABLE, THERE WAS NO FOURTH AMENDMENT VIOLATION

In United States v. Hunt,[1]the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

Vol. 40 No. 16 OFFICER’S USE OF LESS-LETHAL FORCE THAT SERIOUSLY INJURED BYSTANDER FILMING NEAR A PROTESTING CROWD NOT UNREASONABLE GIVEN THAT PROTESTERS OBJECTIVELY POSED AN IMMEDIATE THREAT TO THE SAFETY OF OFFICERS, CITIZENS, AND PROPERTY

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Cheairs v.

Vol. 40 No. 15 CALIFORNIA’S AMMUNITION BACKGROUND CHECK REGIME, WHICH REQUIRES FIREARM OWNERS TO COMPLETE BACKGROUND CHECKS BEFORE EACH AMMUNITION PURCHASE, VIOLATES THE SECOND AMENDMENT

In Rhode v. Bonta,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals