Vol. 14 No. 4- Re: Federal Gun Ban/ Domestic Violence

June 8, 1999

CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM
June 8, 1999

COMING SOON!

Additionally, this might interest you

Jones Mayer attorneys at the firm booth at the Cal Cities 2026 Annual Conference and Expo in Anaheim

What We Brought Home from Cal Cities 2026

Each year, Jones Mayer attorneys join city leaders from across

Vol. 41 No. 8 GOVERNMENT’S PROSECUTION OF INDIVIDUAL UNDER 18 U.S.C. SECTION 922(G)(3)’S UNLAWFUL CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE USER PROVISION BANNING GUN POSSESSION DEEMED INCONSISTENT WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND IMPLICATIONS FOR CCW ISSUANCE IN CALIFORNIA

In United States v. Hemani,[1]the United States Supreme Court concluded

Vol. 41 No. 7 OFFICERS THAT INDUCED FALSE TESTIMONY FROM WITNESS THROUGH ABUSIVE INTERROGATION TACTICS WERE NOT ENTITLED TO QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FROM SUIT ALLEGING THEY HAD VIOLATED THE CONSTITUTION BY FABRICATING EVIDENCE TO SECURE CONVICTION

In Ciria v. Gerrans,[1] the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals