Vol. 16 No. 10- Legal Protections Against False Citizen Complaints Declared Unconstitutional

CLIENT ALERT MEMORANDUM December 3, 2001 To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer LEGAL PROTECTIONS AGAINST FALSE CITIZEN COMPLAINTS DECLARED UNCONSTITUTIONAL Within a four-week period of time the California Court of Appeal issued opinions in two cases declaring that Civil Code section 47.5 and Penal Code section 148.6 were unconstitutional “content based” […]

Vol. 20 No. 1- Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act Of 2004 – Where Are We?

LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS SAFETY ACT OF 2004 – WHERE ARE WE? January 3, 2005 Since July 2004, when President George W. Bush signed HR 218 [Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act of 2004 (“Act”)], making it lawful for active and retired law enforcement officers to carry concealed weapons in any of the fifty (50) states, questions […]

Vol. 19 No. 4- Venegas V. Los Angeles County

VENEGAS V. LOS ANGELES COUNTY 32 Cal. 4th 820 (2004) May 13, 2004 California Supreme Court holds that state sheriffs cannot be sued for federal civil rights violation in state courts. Plaintiffs, husband and wife, filed suit in state court against defendants County of Los Angeles alleging causes of action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Plaintiffs […]

Vol. 19 No. 3- Pursuit Legislation

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer PURSUIT LEGISLATION April 15, 2004 If proposed legislation S.B.1866 is passed, it will, virtually, prevent peace officers from pursing individuals who have committed crimes and are fleeing from police. Although it’s stated intent is to reduce potential harm to the public it will, in fact, […]

Vol. 19 No. 2- Ninth Circuit Approves County Jail Strip Search Policy

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer BROOKS ET AL VS. VENTURA BOARD OF SUPERVISORS February 20, 2004 On February 18, 2004, Ventura County Superior Court Judge Henry J. Walsh ruled that a lawsuit by the Sheriff and District Attorney, against the Board of Supervisors, will proceed to trial and rejected the […]

Vol. 19 No. 1- Roe V. City Of San Diego Police Department Et Al.

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer ROE V. CITY OF SAN DIEGO POLICE DEPARTMENT ET AL. February 6, 2004 Ninth Circuit Holds that Police Officer’s Right to Publicly Sell Video Tapes of Himself Masturbating is Deserving of some First Amendment Protections. Roe, a San Diego Police Officer, was discovered selling pornographic […]

Vol. 18 No. 22- Darvish V. City Of Inglewood

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer DARVISH V. CITY OF INGLEWOOD December 30, 2003 The California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, ruled on December 29. 2003, in Darvish v. City of Inglewood, that the City violated no provisions of the Public Safety Officers Procedural Bill of Rights Act (POBOR) in […]

Vol. 18 No. 21- Representation Of Personnel Boards

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer REPRESENTATION OF PERSONNEL BOARDS December 26, 2003 An assistant city attorney who has, frequently, provided legal advice and guidance to a personnel board, civil service commission, etc., in the past, cannot serve as an advocate for a party (e.g. police department) in an adversarial proceeding […]

Vol. 18 No. 20- Upland Poa V. City Of Upland

To: All Police Chiefs and Sheriffs From: Martin J. Mayer UPLAND POA v. CITY OF UPLAND December 18, 2003 California Supreme Court Affirms: A Peace Officer’s Right to a Representative of His/Her Choice Under Cal. Gov’t Code § 3303(i) Must be Reasonable We are most pleased to inform you that, on December 18, 2003, the […]